Expand View Figure 21 Priority management actions identified to improve the protection of Australia’s historic heritage Note: Ranking is based on aggregating the survey respondents’ 5 identified highest priority actions to improve the management of historic heritage. A value of ‘1’ is allocated to each action. Source: McConnell (2021a) For more information, go toHistoric heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 21 Priority management actions identified to improve the protection of Australia’s historic heritage
Expand View Figure 22 Australia’s World Heritage properties and National Heritage places, as of 30 June 2020 Notes: Australian World Heritage Properties (in order of listing): 1 – Great Barrier Reef; 2 – Kakadu National Park; 3 – Willandra Lakes Region; 4 – Lord Howe Island Group; 5 – Tasmanian Wilderness; 6 – Gondwana Rainforests of Australia; 7 – Uluṟu–Kata Tjuṯa National Park; 8 – Wet Tropics of Queensland; 9 – Shark Bay, Western Australia; – 10 Fraser Island; 11 – Australian Fossil Mammal Sites (Riversleigh / Naracoorte); 12 – Heard Island and McDonald Islands; 13 – Macquarie Island; 14 – Greater Blue Mountains Area; 15 – Purnululu National Park; 16 – Royal Exhibition Building and Carlton Gardens; 17 – Sydney Opera House; 18 – Australian Convict Sites; 19 – The Ningaloo Coast; 20 – Budj Bim Cultural Landscape National Heritage places listed since June 2016: a – Australian Cornish Mining Sites: Burra (2017); b – Australian Cornish Mining Sites: Moonta (2017); c – Abbotsford Convent (2017); d – Kamay Botany Bay: botanical collection sites (2017); e – Parramatta Female Factory and Institutions Precinct (2017); f – Melbourne's Domain Parkland and Memorial Precinct (2018); g – Queen Victoria Market (2018); h – Centennial Park (2018); I – Quinkan Country (2018); j – Erawondoo Hill (2020); k – Parkes Observatory (2020); l – Governors’ Domain and Civic Precinct (2021) Source: DAWE (2020a) For more information, go toHeritage recognised under the EPBC Act Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 22 Australia’s World Heritage properties and National Heritage places, as of 30 June 2020
Expand View Figure 23 Climate change pressures considered to have the highest impact on Australia’s heritage, 2020 Note: Figures are based on aggregating the survey respondents’ top 5 pressures identified as having the greatest impact for each heritage type. A value of ‘1’ was allocated to each pressure. Source: McConnell (2021a) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toClimate change Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 23 Climate change pressures considered to have the highest impact on Australia’s heritage, 2020
Expand View Figure 24 Pressures considered to have the greatest impact on Australian heritage, 2020 Note: Figures are based on aggregating the survey respondents’ 5 identified pressures identified as having the greatest impact for each heritage type. A value of ‘1’ was allocated to each pressure. Source: McConnell (2021a) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toClimate change Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 25 Stromatolites, Hamelin Pool, Shark Bay Photo: Western Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions For more information, go toClimate change Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 26 Population pressures considered to have the highest impact on Australian heritage, 2020 Note: Figures are based on aggregating the survey respondents’ 5 pressures identified as having the greatest impact for each heritage type. A value of ‘1’ was allocated to each pressure. Source: McConnell (2021a) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toPopulation Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 26 Population pressures considered to have the highest impact on Australian heritage, 2020
Expand View Figure 27 Industry pressures considered to have the highest impact on Australian heritage, 2020 Note: Figures are based on aggregating the survey respondents’ 5 pressures identified as having the greatest impact on each heritage type. A value of ‘1’ was allocated to each pressure. Source: McConnell (2021a) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toIndustry Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 27 Industry pressures considered to have the highest impact on Australian heritage, 2020
Expand View Figure 28 Priority management actions identified for improving the protection of Australia’s heritage Note: Figures are based on aggregating the survey respondents’ 5 pressures identified as having the greatest impact for each heritage type. A value of ‘1’ was allocated to each pressure. Source: McConnell (2021c) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toNational and international frameworks Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 28 Priority management actions identified for improving the protection of Australia’s heritage
Expand View Figure 29 Staff from Barengi Gadjin Land Council Aboriginal Corporation and Parks Victoria participating in the Dyurrite cultural and environmental heritage assessment survey, November 2020 Photo: Barengi Gadjin Land Council Aboriginal Corporation For more information, go toNational and international frameworks Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 29 Staff from Barengi Gadjin Land Council Aboriginal Corporation and Parks Victoria participating in the Dyurrite cultural and environmental heritage assessment survey, November 2020
Expand View Figure 30 The original Lake Pedder, before the 1973 inundation Photo: Kevin Kiernan For more information, go toManagement approaches Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link