Expand View Figure 11 Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve after the extreme events of 2020 Photo: Ian Brown, New South Wales For more information, go toGeoheritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 12 Priority management actions identified to improve the protection of Australia’s geoheritage Note: Ranking is based on aggregating the survey respondent’s 5 highest priority actions to improve the management of geoheritage. A value of ‘1’ was allocated to each action. Source: McConnell (2021a) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toGeoheritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 12 Priority management actions identified to improve the protection of Australia’s geoheritage
Expand View Figure 13 Total number of historic heritage listed sites on state and territory statutory registers, end June 2020 ACT = Australian Capital Territory; NSW = New South Wales; NT = Northern Territory; Qld = Queensland; SA = South Australia; Tas = Tasmania; Vic = Victoria; WA = Western Australia Notes: Figures for the ACT and the NT include a small number of Indigenous and natural places. The Tasmanian Heritage Register is significantly larger than other state heritage registers because it includes many local places as a result of the mass listing that occurred when the register was created. Source: McConnell (2021d) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toHistoric heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 13 Total number of historic heritage listed sites on state and territory statutory registers, end June 2020
Expand View Figure 14 Number of historic heritage places added annually to state and territory statutory registers, June 2016 to June 2020 ACT = Australian Capital Territory; NSW = New South Wales; NT = Northern Territory; Qld = Queensland; SA = South Australia; Tas = Tasmania; Vic = Victoria; WA = Western Australia Note: The figures for the ACT and the NT include a small number of Indigenous and natural places. Source: McConnell (2021d) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toHistoric heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 14 Number of historic heritage places added annually to state and territory statutory registers, June 2016 to June 2020
Expand View Figure 15 Number of underwater cultural heritage sites protected under Commonwealth legislation and state and Northern Territory legislation, 30 June 2020 DAWE = Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment; NSW = New South Wales; NT = Northern Territory; Qld = Queensland; SA = South Australia; Tas = Tasmania; Vic = Victoria; WA = Western Australia Note: These figures are approximate, as they are taken from the Australasian Underwater Cultural Heritage Database, and from state and territory heritage agencies with responsibility for underwater cultural heritage, and there may be overlaps and omissions. They do not necessarily reflect the number of sites on individual UCH databases, which may include many more sites. The NSW figure is extremely high because it includes coastal waters that overlap with Commonwealth waters. Source: McConnell (2021d) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toHistoric heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 15 Number of underwater cultural heritage sites protected under Commonwealth legislation and state and Northern Territory legislation, 30 June 2020
Expand View Figure 16 Number of underwater cultural heritage sites added each year to state and territory statutory databases and registers, June 2016 to June 2020 DAWE = Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment; NSW = New South Wales; NT = Northern Territory; Qld = Queensland; SA = South Australia; Tas = Tasmania; Vic = Victoria; WA = Western Australia Note: These figures are approximate, as they are taken from the Australasian Underwater Cultural Heritage Database, and from state and territory heritage agencies with responsibility for underwater cultural heritage, and there may be overlaps and omissions. Source: McConnell (2021d) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toHistoric heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 16 Number of underwater cultural heritage sites added each year to state and territory statutory databases and registers, June 2016 to June 2020
Expand View Figure 17 The wreck of the PS Rodney Photo: Dr Brad Duncan, Senior Maritime Archaeologist, Heritage NSW For more information, go toHistoric heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 18 Part of the Australian Antarctic Division heritage collection, Kingston, Tasmania Photo: Anne McConnell For more information, go toHistoric heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 18 Part of the Australian Antarctic Division heritage collection, Kingston, Tasmania
Expand View Figure 19 Pressures that are identified as having the greatest impact on historic heritage (including survival, condition and integrity) Note: Ranking is based on aggregating the survey respondents’ 5 pressures identified as having the greatest impact on historic heritage. A value of ‘1’ is allocated to each identification. Source: McConnell (2021a) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toHistoric heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 19 Pressures that are identified as having the greatest impact on historic heritage (including survival, condition and integrity)
Expand View Figure 20 Lake Burley Griffin’s West Basin, showing the start of infill and redevelopment, February 2021 Photo: George Rooks, Lake Burley Griffin Guardians For more information, go toHistoric heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 20 Lake Burley Griffin’s West Basin, showing the start of infill and redevelopment, February 2021