Expand View Figure 01 Total number of Indigenous heritage listed sites on state and territory statutory registers, 30 June 2020 ACT = Australian Capital Territory; NSW = New South Wales; NT = Northern Territory; Qld = Queensland; SA = South Australia; Tas = Tasmania; Vic = Victoria; WA = Western Australia Notes: Figures for NSW are from the Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System, for Qld from the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage Database, for the NT from the Archaeological Sites Database, and for the ACT from the Indigenous sites database. The NT figures include 143 sites classified as Macassan (but the number of Macassan sites is likely to be higher). A small number of Indigenous heritage places are also listed on national lists, and on some state and territory heritage registers established under general or historic heritage legislation, but these places have not been included here due to their generally small number and overlaps in some cases. Source: McConnell (2021d) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toIndigenous heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 01 Total number of Indigenous heritage listed sites on state and territory statutory registers, 30 June 2020
Expand View Figure 02 Number of Indigenous heritage sites added each year to state and territory statutory registers, June 2016 to June 2020, aggregated NSW = New South Wales; Qld = Queensland; SA = South Australia; Tas = Tasmania; Vic = Victoria; WA = Western Australia Notes: Figures for NSW are from the Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System (no data were supplied for 2015–16), and for Qld from the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage Database. No data were supplied for the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory. No places were removed from lists except in Western Australia, where 20 places were removed between June 2016 and June 2020 (no data were supplied for NSW). Source: McConnell (2021d) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toIndigenous heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 02 Number of Indigenous heritage sites added each year to state and territory statutory registers, June 2016 to June 2020, aggregated
Expand View Figure 03 A koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) – one of Australia’s iconic species Photo: Geoff Williamson For more information, go toNatural heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 04 Australia’s terrestrial and marine protected areas, including Indigenous Protected Areas, highlighting new places since end of 2015 Note: Data correct as at December 2020. Source: DAWE (2020a) For more information, go toNatural heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 04 Australia’s terrestrial and marine protected areas, including Indigenous Protected Areas, highlighting new places since end of 2015
Expand View Figure 05 Australia’s National Reserve System, showing the protection level of Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia regions, 2020 (left); and change in protection level of regions, 2016–20 (right) Note: Data correct as at December 2020. Source: DAWE (2020a) For more information, go toNatural heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 05 Australia’s National Reserve System, showing the protection level of Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia regions, 2020 (left); and change in protection level of regions, 2016–20 (right)
Expand View Figure 06 Pressures that are considered to have the greatest impact on natural heritage, in terms of survival, condition and integrity, 2021 Note: Ranking is based on aggregating the survey respondents’ 5 pressures identified as having the greatest impact on natural heritage. A value of ‘1’ was allocated to each selected pressure. Source: McConnell (2021a) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toNatural heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 06 Pressures that are considered to have the greatest impact on natural heritage, in terms of survival, condition and integrity, 2021
Expand View Figure 07 Expert opinion on priority management actions for improving protection of Australia’s natural heritage Note: Ranking is based on aggregating the survey respondents’ 5 highest priority actions to improve the management of natural heritage. A value of ‘1’ was allocated to each action. Source: McConnell (2021a) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toNatural heritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 07 Expert opinion on priority management actions for improving protection of Australia’s natural heritage
Expand View Figure 08 Marnpi dreaming, bronzewing pigeon, 1994 Source: Uncle Badger Bates, Barkandji Elder For more information, go toGeoheritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 09 A-tents, Cooleman Plain, Kosciuszko National Park Photo: Regina Roach For more information, go toGeoheritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link
Expand View Figure 10 Pressures that are are considered to have the greatest impact on geoheritage Note: Ranking is based on aggregating the survey respondents’ 5 pressures identified as having the greatest impact on geoheritage. A value of ‘1’ was allocated to each pressure. Source: McConnell (2021a) Download Go to data.gov For more information, go toGeoheritage Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share this link